History of ORCAA

Over 50 years of working for our communities

A half century ago, a small local government agency emerged to protect air quality in the counties of the Olympic Peninsula. The passage of the Washington State Clean Air Act in 1967 set the stage for six counties — Clallam, Grays Harbor, Jefferson, Mason, Pacific, and Thurston — to join together to form the Olympic Air Pollution Control Authority (OAPCA), later renamed Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA).

The agency, formally launched March 24, 1968, opened with an inaugural annual budget of just $26,145 ($23,845 in federal grants — and this prior to passage of the federal Clean Air Act — and $2,300 in state grants). The first several months of the agency’s existence were spent developing formal local air quality rules and regulations. Those policies were adopted by the agency’s board of directors in 1969 as OAPCA’s Regulation 1, which were in effect the local counterpart of the state clean air act.

During those initial years of operation, the primary focus of the agency was large industrial sources, such as the Farwest Aluminum Corporation of Aberdeen and wood products companies around the region. Through the first two years of work, the agency staff also tackled the issue of sawmill wood-waste burners, known colloquially as ‘wigwam burners.’

Those large cone-shaped metal structures, topped with mesh panels, were considered by the industry to be the ultimate, ‘clean, efficient waste burners.’ Those forms of burners were banned by state law in 2005!

The creation of the state Clean Air Act (Chapter 70A.15 RCW) in 1967 clearly defined Washington’s rationale for air quality protections, and outlined the need for regional agencies such as ORCAA.

The opening statement reads, in part: “It is hereby declared to be the public policy of Washington Clean Air Act to secure and maintain such levels of air quality as will protect human health and safety, policy, and – to the greatest degree practicable – prevent injury to plant and animal life and property, foster the comfort and convenience of its inhabitants, promote the economic and social development of the state and facilitate the enjoyment of the natural attractions of the state.

“The problems and effects of air pollution are frequently regional and interjurisdictional in nature and are dependent upon the existence of urbanization and industrialization in areas having common topography and recurring weather conditions conducive to the buildup of air contaminants. It is also declared as public policy that regional air pollution control programs are to be encouraged and supported to the extent practicable as essential instruments for the securing and maintenance of appropriate levels of air quality.”

One of the first real challenges faced by the board – composed of representatives from the cities and counties comprising OAPCA – was eliminating the toxic smoke produced during trash burning at municipal garbage dumps. Most cities and counties operated at least one large communal ‘dump’ where residential and business waste was piled and burned on a regular basis. A letter, dated Feb. 27, 1970, from the City of South Bend to the OAPCA Control Officer, Joel Durnin, underlined the challenges faced by the agency, and the municipalities it served. That letter stated, “We request the City of South Bend be allowed to burn garbage until a land fill becomes available. South Bend has collaborated with Pacific County on a landfill garbage dump. The Director of Public Works…has indicated the land fill is in the planning stages.”

Other counties and cities asked for temporary variances while working out the logistics of building new landfills – facilities that required permits and zoning changes from other government agencies. In short, the work to protect the air was slowed by other laws designed to protect land and water. But by the early 1970s most of those trash burning ‘dumps’ were closed, and large landfills were in use.

Unfortunately, though the scale is much smaller today, the challenge of residential trash burning continues. ORCAA staff regularly respond to smoke complaints resulting from illegal trash burning by individuals. Trash burning, and the use of burn containers such as burn barrels, is illegal under the state Clean Air Act, as well as ORCAA’s own regulations.

An even bigger task facing the OAPCA in its early years was curbing industrial emissions. With a broad assortment of wood-products mills throughout the six-county region, industrial air pollution topped the list of issues to be addressed. Cedar shake/shingle mills burned their waste wood in ‘wigwam’ burners. Plywood and lumber mills burned ‘hog fuel’ (i.e. wood waste) to power their boilers. But according to ORCAA’s longest-serving Control Officer (now known as the Executive Director), “pulp mills were the big problem for us.”

Chuck Peace, OAPCA Control Officer from 1976 to 2004, said “Those pulp mills put out a lot of smoke and toxic emissions, and their solution to compliance at the time was simply to build their (smoke) stacks a little higher.” Compliance was difficult in part, Peace said, because, “when we found violations of the law, the agency wasn’t able to give a ticket that carried a big enough value for the industry to take notice of.” With maximum fines capped at just $1,000 for much of the first two decades of its existence, “we were trying to achieve compliance with too small of a stick.” Eventually, the maximum penalty was increased. Today, the maximum fine ORCAA can assess for each violation is capped at $14,915. But even today, that “small stick” compliance effort is a problem in that first-time violations – and even the first few repeat offenses – are assessed minor fines. So, the current ORCAA Board of Directors is considering an adjustment to the “Penalty Assessment Worksheet” to assess much higher fine values earlier in the process for repeat offenders.

Another problem OAPCA faced was the prevalence of illegal drug manufacturing in remote areas of its jurisdiction. The problem, in terms of air quality, came after police raided those ramshackle old building used by the groups ‘cooking’ methamphetamine. Once the illegal operations were shut down, Peace said, “the county sheriff departments usually wanted to burn those structures down. Proper demolition was just not safe, or practical, given the hazards of poisons and explosives in there,” Peace said. “So we were asked for, and gave, multiple waivers for demolition burns of drug houses.”

Today, pharmaceutical production is again a problematic issue of concern for ORCAA, though this time, the production is legal and the problem is odors rather than air toxics. The development of a legal marijuana production industry in Washington has generated a high volume of odor complaints from residents living near the brand-new operations. Marijuana plants produce very pungent odors, especially during the bloom cycle, and affected residents have turned to their local air agencies such as ORCAA for help.

Issues such as that highlight the importance of having local agencies such as ORCAA, said Peace. He noted that even after 24 years leading the agency, he recognized the need to continue to evolve and build on past successes. “I think Washington (state) is doing things right. In fact, Washington’s program is awesome compared to what I see in other parts of the country.”

Peace retired to property he had long owned in the Missouri Ozarks. “Here in Missouri, opening burning is pretty much unregulated and the air can get pretty nasty at times. I think Washington’s program is awesome. That three-tiered process on air pollution control – using local agencies to enforce local, state, and federal clean air regulations – is really the best way to go. That’s what the most effective states are doing: Partnering states with local agencies, supported by federal participation, to work directly with people.”

Fifty years after its creation, ORCAA still faces challenges. Some are similar to those faced by the agency in 1960s, but many are very different, though no less important. More than 800 industrial sources are registered with ORCAA today.  And smoke from wood burning remains as one of the largest sources of air pollution in our region. Today, that smoke comes from use of wood stoves and fireplaces for home heating, outdoor burning of residential yard waste, or large-scale open burning from land clearing and silvicultural activities. ORCAA works closely with other agencies on various outdoor burning issues, and the agency strives to reduce wood smoke emissions from home-heating devices by encouraging clean burning practices. ORCAA also partners with the state Department of Ecology to address the areas most impacted by wood smoke by providing financial incentives to homeowners to replace their old, uncertified wood stoves with clean appliances such as ductless heat pumps or natural gas stoves.